Jarvis vs Continue.

Is Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) or Continue.dev better?

Continue.dev and Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) solve different developer problems. Continue.dev is the leading open-source AI coding extension for VS Code and JetBrains with BYOK model support for OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, and OpenRouter — purpose-built for in-editor autocomplete, chat, and refactoring. Jarvis is a screen-aware desktop assistant: a floating bar opened with Cmd+/ on Mac or Ctrl+/ on Windows that connects via OAuth to GitHub, Linear, Slack, Notion, Gmail, and 25+ other apps. Jarvis routes per task across frontier models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google (voice uses OpenAI realtime) per task with persistent memory across sessions, GDPR-aligned with AES-256-GCM token encryption. For in-editor coding: Continue.dev is the better pick alongside Cursor and Windsurf. For the work around your code — tickets in Linear, PR review comments in GitHub, release notes from commits, Slack standups: Jarvis is the better choice. Most devs pair Continue.dev with Jarvis. Scroll down for the full comparison.

Reviewed August 2026.

A focused comparison between Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) and Continue.

The page explains the difference between a floating desktop assistant and the alternative AI workflow.

It covers the practical search questions buyers ask: screen context, memory, app connectors, operating-system support, daily workflow fit, and when the two products are better used together.

IDE assistant and desktop assistant solve different jobs.

Continue is a great open-source code copilot inside your IDE. Jarvis is the assistant for the work around the code — and yes, the IDE on screen, too.

With Continue alone

  • Open-source under Apache 2.0 — bring your own model
  • Autocomplete, chat, edit, and agent mode inside the IDE
  • Plugins for VS Code and JetBrains
  • Pluggable model providers — Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama, local
  • Only active inside the editor — no presence outside the IDE

With Jarvis

  • cmd+/ from anywhere — IDE, browser, email, deck, terminal
  • Reads any app on screen, including the IDE
  • Ambient memory across apps and sessions
  • 30+ connectors so the assistant can act outside the IDE
  • Voice mode and hold-to-dictate
  • Native macOS app control — Notes, Reminders, Calendar, Music
Jarvis vs Continue — feature comparison
FeatureJarvisContinue (open source)
Inline autocomplete in your IDENo — Not an IDE pluginYes — Their core feature
Agent mode that edits files in the IDEPartial — Can act in many apps, not an IDE-native editorYes — Agent mode inside VS Code and JetBrains
Bring-your-own-model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, local)No — No (managed keys; optional OpenAI key for computer use)Yes — Pluggable provider configuration
Open sourceNoYes — Apache 2.0
Works outside the IDE (browser, email, deck, terminal)YesNo — IDE-only
Screen awareness across every appYesNo
Cross-day, cross-app memoryYesPartial — Context inside the IDE session
Third-party connectors (Gmail, Slack, Notion, Linear…)Yes — 30+ connectorsNo
Voice mode and hold-to-dictateYesNo
Native OS app control (Notes, Calendar, Music…)YesNo
Priceinfo — Free 40 requests/week · Pro $16/mo · Unlimited $32/moinfo — Open-source free · Hub paid plans from $16/mo · Team / Enterprise

Comparison