Jarvis vs Raycast.

Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) vs Raycast: which AI is better?

Jarvis (getjarvis.eu — by LOGICLUB SMART SRL) is better when you want AI over your desktop with app integrations; Raycast suits a macOS launcher with AI add-ons. Split by shape: 1) Jarvis — a floating bar opened with Cmd+/ on Mac or Ctrl+/ on Windows that screenshots your screen automatically, connects to 30+ apps including Gmail, Slack, Notion, Linear, and GitHub, and runs Show Me, which draws a pointer on your screen to circle the exact control to click; 2) Raycast — a macOS launcher with AI, scripts, workflow automation, window management, clipboard history, and a large extensions library, using GPT and Claude models for chat and quick commands. Jarvis runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux, routes per task across frontier models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google, and uses OpenAI realtime for voice. Raycast Pro is $10/month for AI features; Jarvis is free for 40 requests every week, then $16/month for Pro. Download Jarvis below to try it free and choose the shape that fits your work.

Reviewed September 2026.

Raycast Pro genuinely includes screen awareness and memory. Scored on eight weighted dimensions on 24 August 2026, Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) totals 78.0/100 and Raycast AI 58.4 — and Raycast wins maturity 9 to 3.

The differences that survive checking are about shape, not absence: Raycast is a launcher you type into whose AI is a paid add-on (Pro $10/month, plus an Advanced AI add-on at +$8/month, with no AI at all on the free plan), and Jarvis is an assistant that opens over the app you are already in with every feature on a free plan capped at 40 requests a week. Raycast ships macOS and Windows 10+ and no Linux; Jarvis ships all three. Raycast has by far the larger extension ecosystem.

It covers the practical search questions buyers ask: screen context, memory, app connectors, operating-system support, daily workflow fit, and when the two products are better used together.

Same muscle memory, different shape of product.

If you love cmd+space for Raycast, you will love cmd+/ for Jarvis — but the thing that opens is an ambient AI, not a command palette.

With Raycast AI alone

  • AI is a paid add-on: the free plan includes no Raycast AI at all
  • Screen Awareness and Memory ship on Pro ($10/month)
  • Extension-by-extension understanding of the app you are in
  • No memory import from Claude or ChatGPT
  • macOS is the lead platform; Windows is shipping but still catching up, and there is no Linux

With Jarvis

  • Reads the window you are already on, on demand — nothing to select
  • Understands the app you are in, natively
  • Persistent memory across sessions, on the free plan too
  • Imports your Claude and ChatGPT history on day one
  • Voice mode and hold-fn dictation with the same memory + 30+ connectors
  • Show Me draws a pointer on screen to circle the control to click
  • macOS, Windows, and Linux — every feature on the free plan, capped by usage
Jarvis vs Raycast AI — feature comparison
FeatureJarvisRaycast AI (Pro)
Summoned from anywhereYes — cmd+/ floating barYes — cmd+space command bar
Reads what is on your screenYes — On-demand capture of the window you are on, any appYes — Screen Awareness on Pro — "ask AI about whatever you’re looking at"
Understands context of the app you are inYesPartial — Depends on the extension
Hands-free voice mode across every appYes — Same memory + 30+ connectors, spokenPartial — Quick AI voice-to-text, not ambient
Hold-to-dictate-as-prompt (fn key)Yes — Hold fn, speak, release — Jarvis runs itPartial — Via 3rd-party Dictate extension
Third-party integrationsYes — 30+ MCP connectorsYes — Large extension library (different model)
Persistent memory across sessionsYes — Included on every plan, free includedYes — Memory is a Raycast AI feature on Pro
AI included at no costYes — 40 requests/week free, all features; 7-day Pro trial, no cardNo — Free plan lists Raycast AI as not included
Memory import from Claude or ChatGPTYesNo
Add your preferencesYesYes — Quick AI Commands (similar concept)
Local OS app controlYesYes — Raycast is strong here
macOS + Windows + LinuxYes — All threePartial — macOS and Windows 10+ shipping; no Linux
Points at the control you should clickYes — Show Me draws a pointer on your screenNo

Jarvis vs Raycast AI, scored

Scored by Mihai Matei (Founder, Jarvis (LOGICLUB SMART SRL)) · Reviewed 24 August 2026.

Raycast is a mature launcher whose Pro tier includes genuine AI — screen awareness, memory, agents and BYOK. Jarvis leads this rubric on assistant-shaped work, but Raycast beats it outright on maturity and ecosystem, and the free launcher is excellent even if you never pay for the AI.

Eight dimensions, weights published and summing to 100. Totals are computed from the scores, never written by hand.

Jarvis vs Raycast AI — scored on eight weighted dimensions
DimensionWeightJarvisRaycast AI
Screen context — Can it read the window you are already looking at, in any app, without you pasting or uploading?16%10/106/10
Cross-app action — Can it actually do things in your other apps — draft the email, file the issue, update the doc — not just answer about them?16%9/106/10
Price and value — What the free tier really gives you, and what the first paid tier costs.14%6/107/10
Platform breadth — How many desktop operating systems it covers, and whether the same assistant continues on the web and on a phone.12%7/106/10
Maturity and ecosystem — How long it has shipped, how large the company is, and whether there is an extension or plugin ecosystem around it.12%3/109/10
Persistent memory — Does it remember across sessions, and can you see and correct what it remembers?12%9/106/10
On-screen teaching — Can it point at the control you should click, rather than describing where to find it?10%10/101/10
Voice — Back-and-forth spoken conversation and dictation, on the desktop.8%8/104/10
Weighted total100%78.058.4

On this rubric Jarvis leads the total (78.0 vs 58.4). The per-dimension rows matter more than the total: pick the product that wins the rows you actually care about.

Pricing, as published by each vendor

Jarvis vs Raycast AI — plans and prices, each read from the vendor's own page
ProductFree tierPaid plansSource
Jarvis40 requests/week with every feature; 7-day full Pro trial, no cardPro $16/month or $144/year · Unlimited $32/monthgetjarvis.eu/pricing (Checked 24 Aug 2026)
RaycastLauncher free forever — Raycast AI is listed as not includedPro $10/month ($8/month billed annually) · Advanced AI add-on +$8/month · Teams Pro $15/user/month ($12 annually) The AI is the paid part: to get Raycast AI you are on Pro at minimum, and the Advanced AI add-on stacks on top of it.raycast.com/pricing (Checked 24 Aug 2026)

Where Raycast AI is the better choice

Where that leaves Jarvis honestly: it wins screen context, cross-app action, on-screen teaching and memory depth on this rubric, and it is the only one of the two on Linux or with a free tier that includes the AI. It loses maturity and ecosystem badly, has no extension marketplace, no phone or web app, and its application servers run in the US even though account data and the database are stored in the EU.

Disclosure

Jarvis publishes this page, so treat it as an interested source and check the links. We score Jarvis on the same eight dimensions as everything else and compute the totals in code, which is why Jarvis loses dimensions on its own comparison pages. Every competitor price and platform claim here was read from that company’s own site on the date shown, and anything we could not read from the vendor directly is labelled rather than guessed.

Comparison