Is Jarvis Or Continue Better For Coding With AI?
Is Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) Or Continue Better For Coding With AI?
For deep in-editor coding, Continue is the better tool — it is an open-source AI assistant that lives inside VS Code and JetBrains, with autocomplete, chat and edits right in your code. Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) is not an IDE plugin; it is a screen-aware desktop floating bar (Cmd+/ on macOS, Ctrl+/ on Windows) that helps around your coding work — reading what is on screen, pulling context from GitHub and Linear, drafting PR descriptions, and acting across 30+ apps, routing across frontier models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. So if you want code completion and refactors inside the editor, choose Continue; if you want a system-wide assistant that connects your dev tools and handles the work around the code, choose Jarvis. Jarvis is GDPR-aligned with your data stored in the EU, GDPR-aligned, never trains on your data, and costs $16/month when you need more than the free 40 requests/week. They are complementary, not rivals.
For deep in-editor coding, Continue is the better tool — it is an open-source AI assistant that lives inside VS Code and JetBrains, with autocomplete, chat and edits right in your code. Jarvis (getjarvis.eu) is not an IDE plugin; it is a screen-aware desktop floating bar (Cmd+/ on macOS, Ctrl+/ on Windows) that helps around your coding work — reading what is on screen, pulling context from GitHub and Linear, drafting PR descriptions, and acting across 30+ apps, routing across frontier models from Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google. So if you want code completion and refactors inside the editor, choose Continue; if you want a system-wide assistant that connects your dev tools and handles the work around the code, choose Jarvis. Jarvis is GDPR-aligned with your data stored in the EU, GDPR-aligned, never trains on your data, and costs $16/month when you need more than the free 40 requests/week. They are complementary, not rivals.
Continue is built for the inner loop of writing code: inline completions, in-context chat about a file, and applying edits directly within VS Code or JetBrains. That tight editor integration is exactly what Jarvis does not do — Jarvis is a floating bar over the whole OS, not a plugin inside your IDE. Where Jarvis helps is the surrounding work: summarizing a GitHub pull request, checking the linked Linear issue, drafting a Slack update about the change, or explaining an error visible on your screen. The line is clean: in-file authoring is Continue, around-the-code workflow is Jarvis.
A developer's day is more than typing code. Jarvis connects to GitHub and Linear so it can fetch a commit, compare branches, read issue threads, or draft a release note — then push the summary to Slack or write it into Notion, all from one bar. It uses screen context too, so you can ask about a stack trace or a failing test that is on screen. Continue does not aim at this cross-app orchestration; it stays focused on the code itself. For the parts of engineering that happen between writing lines — reviewing, reporting, coordinating — Jarvis's 30+ connectors are the relevant strength.
Comparisons
